By Emily Reynolds, Consultant - NFE global programme, British Council

03 July 2026 - 15:30

Three people speaking on a panel at a conference, the person in the middle is holding a microphone.
Participants in Youth Connect Live are encouraged to see themselves as active contributors, capable of shaping their communities now, not only in the future  ©

British Council

Leadership is evolving, and not always in the ways we might expect. As Emily Reynolds argues, younger generations are quietly questioning what it means to lead. In a time of global uncertainty, their expectations are practical, personal and, at times, refreshing.

From heroes to humans 

For much of modern history, leadership was seen as the domain of a select few. Nineteenth-century thinking, often described as the ‘Great Man’ theory, assumed that leaders were born rather than made. Leadership was tied to charisma, authority, and, often, social status. The focus was on the individual and their personal power. 

In the early twentieth century, this idea evolved into trait theory. Researchers tried to identify the specific qualities that made a leader effective, from intelligence and confidence to physical presence. Yet this approach had its limits. It could describe leaders, but it could not fully explain how leadership worked in practice. 

By the 1940s and 1950s, attention shifted again. Behavioural theories asked a different question: not who leaders are, but what they do. Leadership became observable. It could be learned, practised and improved. The distinction between task-focused and people-focused leadership emerged, laying the groundwork for modern management training. 

Later, contingency and situational theories added nuance. These approaches argued that there is no single best way to lead. Instead, effective leadership depends on context: the task, the team, and the wider environment. A style that works in one situation may fail in another. 

By the late twentieth century, a new contrast had taken hold. Transactional leadership focused on structure, supervision and performance, often driven by rewards and penalties. Transformational leadership, by contrast, aimed higher. It sought to inspire people, to align them with a shared purpose and to encourage them to exceed expectations. 

From the 1990s until recently, leadership thinking has moved decisively towards a more human-centred model. Concepts such as servant leadership, authentic leadership and shared leadership emphasise empathy, ethics and collaboration. Leaders are expected to listen, to support and to bring others with them. Authority alone is no longer enough. 

A surprising return to ‘Great Man’ leadership 

Despite this long shift towards more inclusive approaches, there are signs that older models of leadership are resurfacing. Strong, personality-driven leadership is gaining ground. These models place power firmly with the individual, enabling the erosion of institutions through polarisation and disinformation, relying heavily on personal authority and division

This resurgence is often linked to wider social and political trends and a decline in public trust. Where trust in institutions is low, or where people feel unheard, there can be a pull towards leaders who promise clarity, certainty, and decisive action. Such leadership can be appealing in times of instability, even if it comes at the cost of collaboration or transparency. 

This creates tension. On one hand, modern leadership theory encourages participation, dialogue and shared responsibility. On the other hand, real-world pressures can drive a return to more centralised control. Understanding this tension is essential, particularly for educators working with young people who are developing their own ideas about leadership. 

What young people want 

For Millennials and Generation Z, leadership is no longer defined by title or hierarchy. Instead, it is judged by behaviour, values and impact. 

Authenticity sits at the centre of this shift. Young people expect leaders to be genuine. They look for consistency between words and actions, and they value honesty over perfection. A leader who admits mistakes and shows vulnerability is often seen as more credible than one who appears distant or flawless. 

Purpose is equally important. Younger generations want their work to mean something. They are less motivated by profit alone and more interested in contributing to organisations that reflect their values. This might include a focus on sustainability, social impact or community engagement. Work is not separate from identity; it forms part of it. 

They also expect to be recognised as individuals. This goes beyond job roles or productivity. It includes wellbeing, personal development and life beyond work. Flexibility is no longer a benefit but a baseline expectation. Mental health, in particular, is seen as a core responsibility for leaders, not an optional concern. 

At a structural level, younger generations prefer collaboration over hierarchy. They are drawn to environments where ideas can be shared openly and where diverse perspectives are valued. Feedback is continuous rather than occasional, and leadership is often distributed across teams rather than concentrated at the top. 

In practical terms, this represents a clear shift: 

• Leadership is based on trust rather than control 

• Purpose matters as much as performance 

• Leaders are accessible, not distant 

• Flexibility replaces rigid structures 

For educators, these expectations matter. They shape how young people engage in classrooms, training programmes and professional environments. Leadership is something they expect to practise, not simply observe. 

Skills for a changing world 

As expectations evolve, so too do the skills associated with leadership. Increasingly, these skills are not technical but interpersonal. 

Collaboration is central. Young people need to work effectively with others, often across cultures, disciplines and digital platforms. This requires not only teamwork but also the ability to listen, negotiate and adapt. 

Confidence is another key area. Leadership often involves stepping into uncertainty, whether that means speaking in public, sharing ideas or challenging established thinking. Building this confidence takes time and support, particularly in educational settings. 

Emotional intelligence has also become essential. Understanding one’s own responses, as well as the feelings and perspectives of others, is critical in diverse and fast-changing environments. It underpins effective communication and helps to build trust within teams. 

Critical thinking and problem-solving are equally important. Leaders are expected to navigate complexity, weigh different viewpoints and make informed decisions. These are skills that can be developed through inquiry, discussion and real-world application. 

Communication remains at the heart of all of this. The ability to express ideas clearly, whether in writing, in speech or in digital formats, is fundamental to leadership. It enables individuals to influence, to collaborate and to inspire. 

Programmes such as the British Council’s Youth Connect Live reflect these priorities. It focuses on practical engagement rather than theory alone, offering opportunities to practise speaking, share ideas and develop a global perspective. Participants are encouraged to see themselves as active contributors, capable of shaping their communities now, not only in the future. 

The path ahead 

Leadership continues to evolve. It responds to changes in society, technology and culture, and reflects the values of each new generation. 

Today, we are at a point of contrast. Traditional, top-down models might again hold influence in many settings, yet there is a strong demand for leadership that is inclusive, ethical and collaborative. 

For educators and institutions, this presents a clear challenge. It is no longer enough to prepare young people to follow established systems. They must also be equipped to question, to adapt and to lead in different ways. 

This means creating learning environments that encourage participation, build confidence and value diverse perspectives. It means recognising that leadership is not fixed but learned. And it means supporting young people to develop not only skills, but also a sense of purpose. 

If leadership is to remain relevant, it must reflect the realities of the world in which it operates. For a generation that values connection, fairness and meaning, the most effective leaders will not simply direct. They will listen, include and enable others to succeed.

 

You might also be interested in: